Dear Bloggers,
few days ago the Minister Mastella has delighted us with a new performance. During transmission
"Annozero" presented by Santoro, good Clement left the room as threatened by the dangerous questions from a gay guy of 21 years subversive citing articles (the declaration of human rights) and offended by the cartoons of Vauro. Poor thing!
course the most reactionary circles condemn Santoro and express solidarity with the minister ceppalonic caring to raise a fuss of opinions, but never look at the facts.
Facts:
- In all the countries of Europe, except Greece and Poland, there is a form of regulation to de facto couples and homosexual couples. Perhaps Italy is a country more civilized France, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Spain? I'm sorry, but the answer is a resounding no!
- is statistically proven that the Catholic clergy is ever a group with a high density of homosexuals. No offense to anyone, as a percentage, there are more gay priests (often repressed) that gay MPs. Just as there are, in percentage, the more affected in Parliament or in the ZEN Librino or scampi. Allow me to quote a subversive text: "Why look at the speck that is in thy brother and can not see the beam in your own eye, and how can you say to your brother, 'Brother, let me Thyself the speck that is nell'occhio», non vedendo la trave che hai nel tuo occhio? Ipocrita! Leva prima la trave dal tuo occhio; ed allora vedrai di togliere la pagliuzza, che è nell'occhio del tuo fratello"(Matteo, 7, 1-5)
Andiamo avanti: da una parte ci si lamenta delle ingerenze della Chiesa cattolica, dall'altro si recrimina una deriva relativista.
La Chiesa non ha il diritto di esprimere le proprie opinioni in questioni etiche: ha il dovere di farlo!
Il problema è che in Italia le opinioni della Chiesa vengono espresse a reti unificate ed una frequenza tale, che a confronto Berlusconi is a champion of democracy and pluralism. Why is
from voice only to a part, showing a level playing field for maybe circus pictures of Gay Pride, strengthening the argument for art homophobic?
why are not there in-depth information on the experiences of other countries (those most of our civilian)?
Ruini Why does not compare directly with Luxuria or Cecchi Paone?
Porta a Porta a share that was not the end of the world ...
The title of this post provides my personal opinion: I am against DICO or PACS.
These buildings are only legal marriages in light version for weaklings.
and heterosexual couples can get married in the Catholic church and sugellare their love before God and State. The non-Catholic
heterosexual couples can marry in a civil ceremony and sugellare their love in front of the State.
Oh I know: to take this step today, it takes balls. But nobody is forcing us and then a good pre-NUP may limit the damage.
remain the same-sex couples.
Our solution is simple and radical: all the rules of the Civil Code Article 79 to 146 (excluding 147 and 148).
accepted alternative proposals, criticisms, comments and testimonies.
Mastella say 
0 comments:
Post a Comment